202104261832160.jpg

AP測驗

課程目標:托福、GRE、GMAT滿分名師團隊親自教學,帶你一戰AP衝高分

課程特色 :


▶個人、小班制精英教育,專業培養直攻頂尖名校資優生。
▶全台北、中、南專業師資團隊親授課程,教學品質冠全國。
▶精心高頻率學科詞彙統整,讓學科單字量倍率提升。
▶自然科學、社會科學核心能力加強,高效率系統性學習。
▶歷屆試題重點題解分析,分科、分級應試技巧大剖析。
▶課後一對一個別親自指導,快速找出學習痛點對症下藥。
▶可搭配托福、SAT、ACT課程,強效提升聽說讀寫全方位能力。

教學實況

 


🔔最專業的AP師資,戴爾的用心付出,值得用心感受

戴爾美語最具教學熱誠的名師團隊,精心規劃出最貼近各級數的分級課程,不論是英文文學、社會科學、自然科學等多項領域的英文學習,都可以感受到戴爾美語師資團隊的專業與用心。在戴爾美語,保證讓你享有最高品質的教學,並培養聽說讀寫全方位的語言能力,成為美國頂尖名校的候選人。

 範例雅思留學核心字彙講解 

課程介紹


 


✿ 精緻型小班、一對一家教AP課程 

進入戴爾美語菁英留學課程之前,我們會進行全方位的英文程度評量,包括字彙數量、核心文法、閱讀理解、以及寫作能力等(針對欲加強托福留學考試的同學,聽力與口說能力也將一併評估),並針對學生個別的程度以及未來想要申請的大學及科系,安排適合的AP課程修習,依照程度進行規劃適合的課程科目及分級上課,目標須在計劃時程內完成全部課業修習,並順利考取理想高分成績。



🔔戴爾美語AP課程規畫地圖


🔔戴爾美語課程分級專業學習規劃

 

個人化課程規劃
★ 精緻化小班、或VIP一對一家教課程設計,可依照學習者的各項英文能力及所需要加強的AP課程不同,規劃出不同程度及不同方式的教學課程。無論是大學的英文文學、微積分、統計學,或自然學科、社會科學領域等科目,皆可進行量身訂製的專業訓練。如欲一併準備TOEFL iBT、SAT、ACT的學習者,也可同時設計及規劃訓練課程,讓學習者把握時間有效率的完成聽力、閱讀、口說及寫作全方位訓練,讓學習者在準備留學考試的時間上更具有效率。

 

專業師資親編教材
★ 在不同學科的AP課程中,安排各階段、各科目的專業師資量身為同學編輯最實用的學習教材,並以同學最能適應及吸收的教學方式進行授課。亦即完全依照同學的個別需求,設計不同類別的教案,幫助同學獲致最佳的學習成效。

 

一對一個別能力指導
★ 在課後特別安排有完整的一對一個別能力指導,可針對同學在學習過程中遭遇的各項問題或學習困擾,即時向老師尋求解答疑惑,快速找出學習上所有大小問題,幫助同學找出學習痛點,並對症下藥,讓同學在不同的學習階段中,不累積疑難問題,讓英文能力、考試能力突飛猛進。

 

歷屆試題模考演練
★ AP課程科目多元,常讓學習者苦惱不知從何準備,戴爾美語除了提供完整的課程訓練,也提供歷屆考題實戰演練,幫助同學快速熟悉及掌握考題趨勢,加強備戰實力。


🔔戴爾美語ACT示範解題
​​​

ACT示範解題

English
I grew up with buckets, shovels, and nets waiting by the back door;1 hip-waders hanging in the closet; tide table charts covering the refrigerator door; and a microscope was sitting2 on the kitchen table. Having studied, my mother is3 a marine biologist. Our household might have been described as uncooperative.4 Our meals weren’t always served in the expected order of breakfast, lunch, and supper.
Everything was subservient to the disposal of5 the tides. When the tide was low, Mom could be found down on the mudflats. When the tide was high, she would be standing on the inlet bridge with her plankton net. 

1. Choose the best answer.
(A) NO CHANGE 
(B) waiting, by the back door, 
(C) waiting by the back door, 
(D) waiting by the back door 

解析:
The best answer is (A).
此題考點「平行結構」,需閱讀畫底線後的幾句話,了解此題連續出現三個平行結構。 
選項 (B)(C)(D) 無法形成平行結構,因標點符號錯置。

2. Choose the best answer.
(E) NO CHANGE 
(F) would sit 
(G) sitting 
(H) sat 

解析:
The best answer is (G).
此題考點「平行結構」,需閱讀畫底線後的幾句話,了解此題連續出現三個平行結構並用「分號」做文章語氣停頓。

3. Choose the best answer.
A. NO CHANGE 
B. As my mother’s interest is science, she is 
C. My mother’s occupation is that of 
D. My mother is 

解析:
The best answer is (D).
考點句子簡單式,選項 (D)句型簡潔清楚,符合 clear 原則。
選項 (B)不需另外用 As 表示因果連接兩個句型。
選項 (C )that of 會造成句子累贅問題。

4. Which choice would most effectively introduce the rest of this paragraph? 
(E) NO CHANGE 
(F)There seemed to be no explanation for why Mom ran our household the way she did. 
(G) Our household didn’t run according to a typical schedule. 
(H) Mom ran our household in a most spectacular manner. 

解析:
The best answer is (G).
"Our meals weren’t always served in the expected order of breakfast, lunch, and supper"此句話得知,the household 不會依照一般日常作息活動,而是照海水潮汐(tide),選項 (G)符合。
 
5. Choose the best answer. 
A. NO CHANGE 
B. was defenseless in the face of 
C. depended on 
D. trusted in 

解析:
The best answer is (C).
"Everything depended on the tides"選項(C)句型簡潔清楚,符合 clear 原則。
選項(B)贅字太多。
選項(D)為信任、託付,語意不符。

Reading
 
Personality Disorders
        How should the law treat a mentally disturbed person who commits a criminal offense? Should individuals whose mental faculties are impaired be held responsible for their actions? These questions are of concern to social scientists, to members of the legal profession, and to individuals who work with criminal offenders.
        Over the centuries, an important part of Western law has been the concept that a civilized society should not punish a person who is mentally incapable of controlling his or her conduct. In 1724, an English court maintained that a man was not responsible for an act if“he doth not know what he is doing, no more than . . . a wild beast.” Modern standards of legal responsibility, however, have been based on the McNaghten decision of 1843. McNaghten, a Scotsman, suffered the paranoid delusion that he was being persecuted by the English prime minister, Sir Robert Peel. In an attempt to kill Peel, he mistakenly shot Peel’s secretary. Everyone involved in the trial was convinced by McNaghten’s senseless ramblings that he was insane. He was judged not responsible by reason of insanity and sent to a mental hospital, where he remained until his death. But Queen Victoria was not pleased with the verdict—apparently she felt that political assassinations should not be taken lightly—and called on the House of Lords to review the decision. The decision was upheld and rules for the legal definition of insanity were put into writing. The McNaghten Rule states that a defendant may be found “not guilty by reason of insanity” only if he were so severely disturbed at the time of his act that he did not know what he was doing, or that if he did know what he was doing, he did not know it was wrong.
        The McNaghten Rule was adopted in the United States, and the distinction of knowing right from wrong remained the basis of most decisions of legal insanity for over a century. Some states added to their statutes the doctrine of “irresistible impulse,” which recognizes that some mentally ill individuals may respond correctly when asked if a particular act is morally right or wrong but still be unable to control their behavior.
        During the 1970s, a number of state and federal courts adopted a broader legal definition of insanity proposed by the American Law Institute, which states:“A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.” The word substantial suggests that “any” incapacity is not enough to avoid criminal responsibility but that “total” incapacity is not required either. The use of the word appreciate rather than know implies that intellectual awareness of right or wrong is not enough; individuals must have some understanding of the moral or legal consequences of their behavior before they can be held criminally responsible.
        The problem of legal responsibility in the case of mentally disordered individuals is currently a topic of intense debate, and a number of legal and mental health professionals have recommended abolishing the insanity plea as a defense. The reasons for this recommendation are varied. Many experts believe that the current courtroom procedures—in which psychiatrists and psychologists for the prosecution and the defense present contradictory evidence as to the defendant’s mental state—are confusing to the jury and do little to help the cause of justice. Some also argue that the abuse of the insanity plea by clever lawyers has allowed too many criminals to escape conviction. Others claim that acquittal by reason of insanity often leads to a worse punishment (an indeterminate sentence to an institution for the criminally insane that may confine a person for life) than being convicted and sent to prison (with the possibility of parole in a few years).
        Despite the current controversy, actual cases of acquittal by reason of insanity are quite rare. Jurors seem reluctant to believe that people are not morally responsible for their acts, and lawyers, knowing that an insanity plea is apt to fail, tend to use it only as a last resort. In California in 1980, only 259 defendants (out of approximately 52,000) were successful in pleading not guilty by reason of insanity.

1. One of the author’s main points about the legal concept of responsibility in the passage is that: 
(A) the phrase “not guilty by reason of insanity” has made our legal system more efficient.
(B) responsibility and guilt are legal concepts, and their meanings can be modified 
(C) knowing right from wrong is a simple matter of admitting the truth to oneself. 
(D) people can become severely disturbed without a word of warning to anyone. 

解析:
The best answer is (B).
定位點由第二段得知 McNaghten Rule 與第四、五段得知 During the 1970s, a number of state and federal courts adopted a broader legal definition of insanity proposed by the American Law Institute, which states:“A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his 50conduct to the requirements of the law.
若犯罪者有精神疾病,缺乏認知能力,則不需受罰

2. Based on the passage, the primary purpose for the 1970s redefinition of insanity proposed by the American Law Institute was to: 
(E) eliminate the insanity defense from American courtrooms. 
(F) more precisely define the concepts of responsibility and intellectual capacity.
(G) redefine legal insanity so that it might include as many criminals as possible. 
(H) apply the McNaghten Rule only to trials involving cases of mistaken identity. 

解析:
The best answer is (F).
定位點(43-59 句)1970 年重新定義 sanity 更詳細說明 when "a person is not responsible for criminal conduct 與 a person must have "substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law." 

3. From information in the third and fourth paragraphs (lines 35–58) it can reasonably be inferred that the legal definition of insanity was changed in the 1970s after:
(A) federal courts won a dispute with state courts over a proposal made by the American Law Institute. 
(B) the doctrine of ―irresistible impulse‖ was found to contradict accepted notions of justice. 
(C) proponents of the McNaghten Rule had been using the insanity defense in far too many murder trials. 
(D) several courts found that justice was not always best served when the McNaghten Rule was applied.

解析:
The best answer is (D).
考點第三、四段 Some states added to their statutes the doctrine of 'irresistible impulse,'" (lines 38-39), and later "a number of state and federal courts adopted a broader legal definition of insanity" 由此兩句話可推論出 the original McNaghten Rule 並不適用

4. According to the explanation provided in the fourth paragraph (lines 43–58), use of the word appreciate in the phrase ―to appreciate the wrongfulness‖ (lines 48–49) instead of know implies which of the following? 
(E) The difference between right and wrong is something people feel rather than know, which makes deciding legal responsibility difficult. 
(F) To know implies certainty, and distinguishing right from wrong is often a subjective matter in determining legal responsibility.
(G) The word appreciate suggests that an action and that action’s implications must be understood for there to be legal responsibility. 
(H) An insane person would ―know‖ something the way a sane person would ―know‖ something, and be able to appreciate that knowledge, too

解析:
The best answer is (G).
定位點(53-58 句) The use of the word appreciate rather than know implies that intellectual awareness of right or wrong is not enough; individuals must have some understanding of the moral or legal consequences of their behavior before they can be held criminally responsible.
解釋在犯罪前,一般犯罪者是有基本道德 與法律觀念

5. The passage indicates that the McNaghten case became the basis for future decisions about legal insanity because: 
(A) the House of Lords upheld the verdict of the court despite considerable political pressure. 
(B) there had been an increase in cases of murder involving mistaken identity arising from delusions. 
(C) McNaghten was unable to convince the jury at his trial that he was incoherent and insane. 
(D) McNaghten used a gun to commit murder, thus aggravating the crime in the jury’s mind. 

解析:
The best answer is (A).
定位點(24-29 句) But Queen Victoria was not pleased with the verdict— apparently she felt that political assassinations should not be taken lightly—and called on the House of Lords to review the decision. The decision was upheld and rules for the legal definition of insanity were put into writing.
意指 the House of Lord 支持法院的說詞,雖然受到 Queen Victoria 之政治壓力


(題目來源:AP Official公開資訊)
 

名師風采

戴爾美語身經百戰的台、美、中托福名師教學團隊,學經歷俱優,尤其親赴考場實戰掌握命題趨勢。同時,更創下全國最高紀錄:劉老師3次iBT托福皆取得120滿分紀錄、Rita胡老師取得CBT電腦托福300滿分紀錄、Anthony老師取得iBT托福119分、Tommy余老師取得iBT托福118分、以及外籍托福口試官Max老師…等數十位托福名師教學團隊,實力陣容堅強。近期戴爾美語更加創新開發學員、老師、以及公司間功能強大的APP學習歷程與管理系統,即時拉近老師、學員、以及公司的距離,幫助學習更有效率。凡是加入戴爾美語,我們不僅快速帶領學員達成理想托福成績目標,更教你熟練運用英文聽、說、讀、寫能力於日常生活、以及適應海外求學。」
 

更多名師

高分金榜

「創下全國多項紀錄的戴爾美語名師教學團隊,已帶領數以千計的學員獲取理想高分成績,舉凡:TOEIC多益、TOEFL托福、GEPT全民英檢、IELTS雅思、GRE、SAT…等測驗。看到為數眾多的各類高分學員金榜,就是對於戴爾美語專業教學最大的肯定。正如學員們異口同聲所說:『老師幫助我們的不僅是要求在考試時要拿高分,老師更加勉勵我們在面對自己的未來,必須要具備旺盛的戰鬥力、以及宏偉的企圖心,建立自己的自信心,天助自助,才能幫助自己在競爭的社會中脫穎而出,實現自己的人生夢想』。」

李△葶

  • 分數:中高級
  • 資歷:台中女中
  • 簡述:就算偶爾少上到課,戴爾的補課系統還是能把我重新推上軌道,到後來來戴爾對我而言就是專注的英文時間,是每周最放鬆的時間。

陳△智

  • 分數:980分
  • 資歷:台北科技大學
  • 簡述:我是報名戴爾美語雅思班24週課程,這次會報名參加多益考試(TOEIC),完全是因為Kelvin吳老師的鼓勵,老師教導我們學習方法,也勉勵我們要應用學習方法去多方面嘗試不同的語文測驗,證明自己的英文實力。

羅△倫

  • 分數:7.5分
  • 資歷:逢甲聖荷西工程雙學學士學位系
  • 簡述:由於聖荷西大學要求學生的成績須達到GPA 3.0 和 雅思6分(或托福80分)以上才有資格申請就學,所以在和戴爾的老師討論後,選擇了比較適合我的雅思作為英文檢定成績。

吳△彤

  • 分數:109分
  • 資歷:德光中學
  • 簡述:上了大學之後感覺自己的英文程度退步很多,再加上我很懶惰,所以決定報名補習班,跟著老師的教學方式進行準備,這樣也比較好抓到方向,也比較有效率!
更多金榜